I really hope I’m wrong – that My Man, Roger’s not on his way down. Attribute it to the virus that kept him away from the court the ten days before the Australian Open; to the fact that he didn’t hold a racquet much less play in a practice tournament. But I fear it is a bit more serious than that.
My Man Roger used to command the court; so much so that your heart goes out each time to the unfortunate fellow on the other side of the net. I always said, Roger’s got
talent. Like he was simply born to play this game. Put him on court against someone with tremendous
skill, like Roddick, or Davydenko, or against someone with tremendous
heart, like Baghdatis, or Gonzales, or even Hewitt, and Roger absolutely shines in his exceptionality. The moniker “Federer Express” or FedEx aptly describes how Roger’s all-around game can run roughshod over the best of them. He really is magical. Nadal is the only player who comes close to owning this gift.
The other thing that sets Roger apart is his cool collectedness on court, for which he has earned his second moniker, The Ice Man. He is never fazed, never rattled. And he never lets an error get in the way of the next point.
I watched his 3rd round match against Janko Tipsarevic, ranked 49 in the world and unseeded at the Aussie Open. It was a nail-biting, nerve-wracking, 5-setter that saw My Man Roger struggling to stay in the game, against a man nobody would have predicted could give any of us a fright. I knew there was trouble the minute he got broken in the first set, a set he subsequently lost on a tiebreak. It was almost downhill from there. Roger won the second set but not by much – also on a tiebreak – then promptly lost the 3rd at 5-7. A glimmer of the old magic in the 4th, which he won convincingly at 6-1. And then, I almost peed my pants before Roger won the 5th at 10-8.
10-8!!!My own analysis: The virus had very little to do with it. Roger’s losing a bit of his touch. Maybe it’s simply evolution, adaptation. The other players are getting better because they have to, to beat him. Or maybe it’s simply Roger’s getting overconfident, underestimating his opponents, and getting his comeuppance for thinking himself invincible on court. But what I saw in the Tipsarevic match was a loss of focus, and skill, and heart. Roger was missing shots that, in his “glory days,” were his bread and butter. He kept getting himself caught wrong-footed, failing to anticipate his opponents’ angles and direction, shanking his service returns, netting his first serves. Worse, he made uncharacteristic unforced errors on the forehand, oftentimes missing his signature passing shots and clearing by feet the lines he used to clean so magically in the past. And he was visibly annoyed with himself. So much so that he had to cheer himself on as he won points. I suppose he had to – winning points in this game seemed like such a struggle. He won simply because someone had to, in the end. He was not being generous when he said during his on-court interview that it is unfortunate there are no draws in tennis. This one would have been one.
I’m keeping my fingers crossed.
It’s too soon, Roger. A few more slams (just a couple more, I think) and Sampras’ record will be broken.
I am holding my breath and literally praying. Nadal’s looming.